|
1.4
Cosmochemistry in an astrophysical context– relating the origin
of the Solar System to processes of planet building elsewhere (Hansen,
Lyons, McKeegan, Morris, Shuping, Wasson, Young)
1.4.1
The distribution of H2O in protoplanetary
systems
| |
 |
| |
Figure
1.4.1. Results of finite difference model for
water flow through an asteroid-like body in the early
Solar System (after Young 2001) as a function of radius
and time. Colors show intensity of water flux in the
body m3/(m2s) as it evolves with
time. Where water/rock recorded by isotopes and mineralogy
is high, flux was protracted. Where water/rock is low,
flux was fleeting. The total water content of the original
body was uniform at 20 volume % but the water/rock preserved
in a rock would depend on the original location it occupied
in the body rather than the total water content of the
body. |
|
A key
question related
to the origin and evolution of terrestrial life is that of how water
was accreted to Earth and, more generally, how rocky planets acquire
their water. There are two main possibilities. One, the endogenous
origin, is that the water accreted together with the planetesimals
(ranging from asteroid to Mars in size). The other is that water
present on Earth’s surface today is exogenous, having been
delivered by comet impacts (e.g. Morbidelli et al 2000). At present
there is skepticism about the cometary origin of water because the
ratios of the heavy isotope of hydrogen to the light isotope, D/H,
in the three comets measured thus far (Halley, hyakutake, and Hale-Bopp)
are on the order of 2 times higher than in Earth’s oceans
(Bockelee-Morvan et al. 2000). On the other hand, D/H would most
likely have varied with radial distance from the Sun in the early
Solar System, making the arguments based on D/H uncertain.
One
way to distinguish between the exogenous and endogenous origins
of water in rocky planets is to characterize the amount of water
that was present in planetesimals. Lead-team investigators McKeegan,
Wasson and Young have been studying the role that water played in
the evolution of rocky precursors to planets in the Solar System
through studies of the ways in which carbonaceous chondrite meteorites,
vestiges of the planetesimals, have been altered by reactions with
liquid and/or vaporous water (Choi et al. 1997; Choi et al. 1998;
Young et al. 1999; Young 2001). This work builds on years of studies
pertaining to the role of water in the evolution of planetesimals
(asteroid-like precursors to planets) as evidenced by these primitive
meteorites (e.g., Kerridge and Bunch 1979; Clayton and Mayeda 1984;
Clayton and Mayeda 1999).
It
is clear that the bodies from which at least some carbonaceous chondrites
come from (now represented by the C-type asteroids) had significant
amounts of water within them early in the history of the Solar System,
but exactly how much water existed in primitive meteorite parent
bodies depends on how the data are interpreted. This is an important
question because if objects represented by the C-type asteroids
had uniformly large amounts of water (as suggested by some workers,
e.g. Young et al. 1999), then the implication is that water was
plentiful in the building blocks of the planets in the Solar System
(C-type asteroids are the most abundant type of primitive rocky
body and the largest asteroid 1 Ceres is such an object). In this
case, the origin of water in and on the terrestrial planets need
not have been exogenous (i.e., from late introduction by comets)
but instead could be the residues left over from much larger amounts
of water that existed prior to melting and differentiation of the
bodies (i.e., endogenous).
Alternatively,
if large amounts of water were present in only a small fraction
of the primitive building blocks of the planets (as implied by other
interpretations of the meteorite data, e.g. Clayton and Mayeda 1984),
then water would not have been nearly as plentiful during the planet
building process and would not be expected to have survived the
planet-forming processes in sufficient quantity to explain present-day
abundances (on and within Earth and perhaps Mars).
There
are two models put forward to explain the mineralogical and oxygen
isotopic effects of reactions between water and rocks as evidenced
in carbonaceous chondrite meteorites. One, the closed-system model
put forward by Clayton and Mayeda (1984), states that the amount
of water evidenced by the altered rock materials in a meteorite
is an expression of the amount of water that existed in the entire
parent body (that is to say, the "water/rock ratio" is
a characteristic of the object). The implications of this interpretation
of the data is that while a few carbonaceous chondrite parent bodies
had on the order of 50 volume % water, most had substantially less
(< 10%).
The
other model, the open-system put forward by Young et al. (1999)
and Young (2001) is that the amount of alteration of the meteorite
depended upon where the particular sample came from in the parent
body (Figure 1.4.1). In this model, the parent bodies were heterogeneous
in mineralogy and oxygen isotopic characteristics but they all could
have had on the order of 20 to 30 volume % water to begin with.
If the open-system model is correct, it implies that water was a
major constituent of proto-planets prior to their melting and differentiation.
Distinguishing
between open-system alteration and closed-system alteration of a
chondrite, and thus between large amounts of water in all bodies
and large amounts of water in just a few bodies, requires analysis
of
17O/16O
( 17O)
and 18O/16O ( 18O)
by
ultraviolet laser ablation combined with gas-chromatography isotope
ratio mass spectrometry (Young et al. 1998). This novel technique
is time-consuming but provides a combination of spatial resolution
and precision that can not be obtained by any other method. Young
and others carry out oxygen isotope ratio analyses of carbonaceous
chonderite meteorites to search for signals that can be used to
distinguish between open and closed-system reactions between the
rocks and waters. Collection of data for characterization of a reasonable
sampling of carbonaceous chondrite meteorites will take several
years. The analyses will be carried out in Young’s stable
isotope laboratory at UCLA.
Another
way to examine the likelihood for exogenous and endogeous sources
of water is to study the ways in which giant planets affect the
delivery of water to regions where habitable, terrestrial-like planets
are likely to form. Planetesimals formed beyond the "snow line"
where water is in the solid state in a planetary system are harbingers
of water (e.g., comets). Planetesimals formed inside of the snow
line may be relatively dry. Giant planets interact gravitationally
with planetesimals, in effect stirring them up. What is more, it
is now clear that some giant planets in extrasolar systems may have
migrated radially with respect to their stars, and it has been suggested
that early on gaseous and icy giant planets in the Solar System
may also have moved closer or further from the Sun (e.g., Thommes
et al. 2002). Indeed it has been suggested that a mechanism for
stopping the migration of a giant planet towards its central star
is for it to encounter a sufficient number of asteroid-like or comet-like
planetesimals (Murray et al. 1998). Giant planets are therefore
expected to regulate the distribution of water-bearing planetesimals
into regions of terrestrial planet formation.
The
consequences of this new paradigm of moving giant planets for terrestrial
planet formation are poorly understood. Hansen, in collaboration
with Young, plans to perform a detailed investigation of giant planet-planetesimal
interactions and the implications for the development of solar-like
planetary systems. The challenge will be to cover both the large
dynamic range in mass and the large number of particles necessary
for a realistic description. The results will be examined in the
context of the meteoritic evidence for the early evolution of our
own Solar System.
1.4.2
The astrochemistry of protoplanetary systems and the meteorite record
An
important step in recognizing signs of life, or the essential precursors
to life, is characterization of the various abiotic pathways by
which organic molecules are produced in protoplanetary environments,
including in our own solar nebula (the protoplanetary disk that
surrounded the Sun 4.6 Gyr ago). One potentially important process
for forming organic molecules is photolysis. Lyons and Young have
begun a program of research devoted to elucidating those characteristics
of primitive meteorites that might be explained by photochemistry
in the solar nebula. The goal is to get a better picture of the
role that photochemistry might have played in determining the inorganic
and organic chemistry of the nebula.
One
of the most important clues to the origin of the Solar System is
the presence of an excess of the 16O isotope of oxygen
relative to the two heavier oxygen isotopes, 18O and
17O. This unusual distribution of O isotopes (by terrestrial
standards), discovered by R.N. Clayton in 1973, was one of the reasons
for suggesting that explosion of a nearby super nova might have
triggered the collapse of molecular cloud material to form our Solar
System (16O is a product of such an event). However, the connection
between an overabundance of 16O inferred to derive from a super
nova explosion has not been observed in populations of "presolar"
mineral grains that represent pristine ejecta from stars found in
meteorites. The variability in 16O apparently has another
explanation that remains elusive.
What
is clear is that the 16O enrichment is telling us something
about conditions that prevailed in the very young solar nebula.
Whether these conditions are relevant to the subsequent development
of life on Earth is unknown, but they are almost certain to be central
to our understanding of other young planetary systems and may be
clues to the photochemistry that took place early in the Solar System.
Clayton (2002) made the suggestion that self shielding by CO in
the early solar nebula could have been the origin of the anomalous
array of 18O/16O and 17O/16O in primitive
Solar System materials (the slope-1 line on a plot of 17O
vs. 18O
where 17O
= per mil deviation in 17O/16O relative to
standard mean ocean water and d18O is defined similarly). The efficacy
of the photodissociation of CO as a means for producing slope-1
lines in oxygen three-isotope space is underscored by the detection
of slope-1 oxygen isotope ratios in interstellar CO (Sheffer et
al. 2002). A major component of the CO self shielding hypothesis
is that the starting materials for all solids in the early solar
nebula were rich in 16O, with isotopic compositions comparable
to the most 16O-rich calcium-aluminum-rich inclusion
minerals.
Calculations by Lyons and Young show that self shielding by CO of
a stellar flux of UV photons illuminating regions above and below
the midplane of the solar nebula (the protoplanetary disk that became
the Solar System) should have been sufficient to produce several
Earth masses of oxygen with large depletions in 16O relative
to the starting over time scales > 103 yrs. The most
likely sink for the 17O and 18O-rich oxygen
liberated by photolysis of CO would have been adsorption onto solid
dust grains followed by surface reactions to produce water, as described
for molecular clouds by Yurimoto and Kurimoto (2002). Settling of
these dust grains and radial transport toward the accreting star
(the Sun) brings this source of 16O-depleted oxygen into
the nascent inner Solar System where it can react with gases, minerals,
and liquids that form planet precursors.
| |
 |
| |
Figure
1.4.2. Calculated rate of C18O photodissociation
(white contours) in a protoplanetary disk representing
the solar nebula as a function of radial distance from
the star (R) and height above the midplane (Z). After
calculations by Young and Lyons (2003). |
|
Experiments
show that exposure of ices containing C compounds to UV photons
can produce complex organic compounds (Schutte 2002). The model
put forward by Lyons and Young implies that ices, primarily composed
of water, were important in determining the oxygen isotopic composition
of rocky bodies in the Solar System. It also implies that irradiation
of condensed materials, including ices, by UV photons could have
been an important process, and that the UV photon flux could have
come from the central proto-Sun if the ices existed well above the
midplane. If shown to be correct, there is the possibility that
the origin of organic molecules and 16O anomalies in
primitive meteorites are both telling us about the photochemistry
of the early solar nebula, and perhaps protoplanetary environments
in general.
Theoretical
tests of this model will be conducted in the next several years.
A key refinement will be development of molecular shielding functions.
The effects of mutual and self shielding by H, H2 and
CO were included in the original calculations by using the H2
and CO density-dependent shielding functions of van Dishoeck and
Black (1988). These functions were based on calculations appropriate
for molecular cloud environments, but should be redone for applications
in protoplanetary disks. The calculations will ultimately be extended
to investigate the implications for D/H and N isotopes.
If photochemistry at distal regions in protoplanetary disks is common
in the Galaxy and recorded in the isotopic compositions of meteorites,
then the process should be evident in disks surrounding young low-mass
(i.e., solar-like) stars elsewhere. Lead-team members Shuping and
Morris will test this suggestion by examining the protoplanetary
disks in the Orion Nebula. The relative abundances of carbon monoxide
isotopomers in the disks can be measured directly using millimeter
and submillimeter interferometers. Interferometry is required because
the target disks are typically small; spatial resolution on the
order of, or better than, an arcsecond is required to match or resolve
nearby disks such as those found in Orion and Taurus. Resolution
of up to 0.1" is achievable with the Submillimeter Array and
with the CARMA array (soon to be in operation).
CO
emission has been reported widely in star-forming cores, but only
the new generation of interferometers will be capable of measuring
the isotopomers of CO in compact protoplanetary disks. By measuring
them initially at 230 GHz (the J=2-1 rotational line), where sensitivity
is greatest, Shuping and Morris would establish which disks are
most promising for measurements of the rarest isotope, C17O.
Then higher-lying lines would be measured in order to provide information
on optical depth and the temperature structure in the disks. The
ultimate goal is to determine whether there has been any significant
selection, via photodissociative processes, for the more abundant
isotopomer relative to the CO abundances in the nearby molecular
clouds from which the star and disk formed.
Another
approach to take to investigate isotope abundances in disks is to
observe the near-infrared (4.6 and 2.3 µm) rotational-vibrational
absorption by CO of light from the central star as seen through
the disk. While C13O and C18O are both routinely
observed toward protostellar sources at 4.6 µm, the C17O
isotope has not yet been detected. Absorption line observations
can only be made for protostellar disks with just the right inclination
to our line of sight (60 - 80 degrees), and with central stars that
are sufficiently bright at 1-5 µm. There are a handful of
protostars in Taurus and Ophiuchus which satisfy these conditions.
High-resolution near-infrared spectroscopy of the CO lines at both
2.3 and 4.6 µm can be carried out using the Near-Infrared
Spectrometer (NIRSPEC) at the Keck Observatory (adaptive optics
is not required). In addition to the isotope ratios, these observations
will also enhance our understanding of the overall abundance of
CO in protostellar disks, both in the gas-phase and as ices condensed
onto dust grains (e.g. Shuping et al. 2001, Boogert et al. 2002).
|